The British Museum has recently
switched from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules
(AACR2) to Resource, Description and Access (RDA) in a
hybrid-catalogue intervention.
Alan Danskin, Collection Metadata
Standards Manager at the British Library recently presented to the
Association of Pall Mall Librarians on the introduction of RDA. He pointed out
that for many; RDA was created due to the perception that AACR2 was not
fit for purpose. This is because it has not adapted well
to recent changes in user expectation and technology where information in
presented on different platforms such as the web. Therefore, managing the
cataloguing environment has become increasingly complex and the metadata
captured needed to change.
There are free online training
materials and webinars available for learning about RDA. However, the main
issue with implementing RDA in small libraries or museums is that
there are not many training courses or advice available. I have only come
across the ‘RDA in a day’ course offered by the BL. As many
will know this became very full, very quickly! Alan stated that the
course was success and would run again possibly this year.
For those who have recently been
to library school, you may be aware of the inner workings of the RDA
Toolkit. However, this resource, vast as it may be still requires a
subscription. Furthermore, it does not provide a business case
for the idea of implementing RDA into your library. For example,
the costs in planning, systems configuration and loss of
production due to the impact of training staff. However, Alan did
stress the long-term benefits in better services and discovery through
metadata presentation and thus better catalogue user experience.
Luckily for me, the plan for switching
to cataloguing records in RDA was well underway before I began working at the
British Museum. The ability to have healthy discussions with
several qualified librarians in the workplace has been valuable,
especially when I have had multiple arising questions. The need
for an experienced trainer to whom I can directly engage with
has been much more preferred than wading through pages of the
toolkit. I also believe that it has increased quality assurance
and reduced erroneous cataloguer judgement while cataloguing. For
example, we have discussed and agreed on local practice for 300 field physical
description in the 'color' or 'colour' argument, choosing
the former. We have also decided to limit the statement of
responsibility in the 245 field to 6 authors before stating [and
others]. The first entry being added to 1XX fields and the other
5 entries to 7XX fields.
My biggest challenge so far when
creating RDA records has been authority control and
collaborators. It is always difficult to know which authority you
are dealing with when names appear in non-roman language
scripts that are no present in the Library of Congress Authorities. I will
definitely be working on these aspects of cataloguing with RDA throughout
the next few years. Especially as Alan Danskin stated to the
horror of many at his presentation, that "as it becomes more difficult to deal with
legacy data and incorporating identifying entries in MARC, the future of
cataloguing is likely to not be MARC format". Therefore, it is becoming
a growing necessity for cataloguers to get to grips with RDA, its core
elements and structure based on the conceptual models of FRBR (functional
requirements for bibliographic data) and FRAD (functional requirements for authority
data).
For those who do not have subscription
access to the RDA toolkit and simply want an introduction to RDA practice, it
may be best to invest now in the new publication 'RDA essentials' by Thomas
Brenndorfer. It is available at Facet Publishing for £69.95 (£55.95 for CILIP members). For
those who are debating whether to switch from AACR2 to RDA, Anne's
Welsh book on 'Cataloguing
and Decision-making in a Hybrid environment: Transition from AACR2 to RDA'
is out in August 2016. I am definitely looking forward to her suggestions on
support for cataloguers during this whole process.
Hi Tavian
ReplyDeleteAs a former student, you know you can always get in touch if there's any way you think I may be able to help. I don't have all the answers, but I always do my best for alumni.
Anne